Correlate sufficient evidence
Bring signals and operational context together before a response is considered.
A SΛDB Product · Powered by Decision Architecture
ΛEGIS
Decision Control Plane for Autonomous Cyber Containment
ΛEGIS closes the decision gap between systems that detect threats and controls capable of acting. It turns correlated evidence into governed, authorized, and auditable defensive action.
01
EvidenceTrusted signals and operational context
02
DecisionEvidence-bound recommendation and rationale
03
AuthorizationPolicy, identity, scope, and limits
04
ActionControlled execution through approved actuators
05
AuditVerifiable decision and execution trail
The decision gap
Security tools detect. ΛEGIS governs what happens next.
Detection alone does not determine whether an organization should block an address, revoke a session, isolate an endpoint, or wait for more evidence. ΛEGIS introduces a dedicated control plane for that decision.
Separate recommendation from permission
A proposed response does not become executable until the authorization boundary is satisfied.
Fail closed on divergence
Identity, tenant, evidence, policy, or authorization mismatches stop the execution path.
Decision Architecture
A governed path from evidence to action.
ΛEGIS is designed to sit over the security infrastructure an organization already operates, coordinating the decision instead of replacing detection and enforcement tools.
Examine the architecture →- 01Evidence-boundThe decision remains linked to the context and evidence set that supported it.
- 02Explicitly authorizedRecommendation, authorization, and execution remain distinct states.
- 03Policy constrainedActions are evaluated against organization-defined identity, scope, and limits.
- 04Auditable by designDecision, authorization, execution, and outcome form a traceable chain.
Product scope
A common decision foundation across mission environments.
The product is organized around one governed decision core and specialized public solution areas.
Core solution
ΛEGIS Cyber Defense
Detection-to-containment decision governance for enterprise security operations.
Decision layerDecision Intelligence
Operational context transformed into explainable, policy-constrained decisions.
Evidence layerSensor Network
Normalization, correlation, integrity, and provenance for decision evidence.
Solution areaSupply Chain
Coordinated decision response to operational risk and disruption.
Solution areaAerial Defense
Decision governance for high-consequence aerial and critical environments.
Research trackAI-Adversary Research
Controlled research on defensive decision paths against automated agents.
87.1728ms
Public experimental evidence
Official median detection-to-containment.
Median of 600 measurements across six simulated cybersecurity scenarios in a controlled local experimental environment.
Experimental evidence — not a production SLA or guaranteed production latency.
Explore the public evidence demo →Controlled adoption
Start with one decision, one control, and measurable outcomes.
Map a high-value defensive use case, observe decisions alongside the security team, and define the evidence and policy required before controlled execution.